Saturday, May 23

Chamisa Admits Disappointing Failures In Leading MDC

MDC Alliance president Mr Nelson Chamisa has blamed his party’s dismal performance in the 2018 elections on shambolic preparations and the imposition of candidates.

Speaking at the Bulawayo Press Club on Tuesday evening, Mr Chamisa said his party lost the elections by its “own commissions and omissions.”

MDC Alliance lost to the ruling Zanu-PF which garnered more than two thirds majority in Parliament while Mr Chamisa was also defeated by President Mnangagwa in the presidential poll. 

Mr Chamisa said the party has power hungry individuals who cling onto positions resulting in the MDC Alliance fielding double candidates. 

“We had 32 constituencies where we had double candidates. I can tell you that in those constituencies our combined vote is actually more than Zanu-PF. So, you are right, we had problems and we are correcting those problems. They are problems that are to do with a party that is too small. They are also problems that come with size,” he said. 

“The party has grown bigger than the capacities of most of its leaders. So, we are building the capacity of our leadership at various levels to manage this party, it’s a mass party. It’s an institution. Managing them is something that requires capacity building.”

Mr Chamisa also said his party members were clouded by the love of money in their decision-making hence engaging in corrupt and selfish activities to line their pockets. 

“We are embarking on a new candidate selection process that will give more power to the branches as opposed to more power to the adjudicating authority in the national election directorate, that is the chairman. And we are also changing the signing and the authenticating authorising measures in the party because that is what caused problems. 

“People get money and then they sign for two candidates because money has a way of clouding judgment, so we have to deal with that. We need to deal with that and we are already doing that,” he said

  • Share:

Info News

Best Cybersecurity Services for Financial Institutions

Financial institutions face nonstop cyber threats in 2026.

Hackers target banks, lenders, investment firms, and payment platforms because financial data remains incredibly valuable.

One successful breach can destroy customer trust overnight.

That’s why demand for the best cybersecurity services for financial institutions keeps growing rapidly.

Why Financial Firms Face Elevated Risk

Cybercriminals aggressively pursue:

  • Customer account information
  • Wire transfer access
  • Banking credentials
  • Loan application data
  • Investment accounts

AI-powered attacks are making threats even more sophisticated.

Critical Security Services Financial Firms Need

Strong cybersecurity strategies often include:

  • Endpoint protection
  • SIEM monitoring
  • Penetration testing
  • Multi-factor authentication
  • Employee phishing training
  • Incident response planning

Security gaps become expensive quickly.

Regulatory Pressure Continues Growing

Financial institutions must comply with strict regulations.

Failure to protect customer information may trigger:

  • Lawsuits
  • Regulatory penalties
  • Reputation damage
  • Customer loss

Compliance and cybersecurity now work together closely.

Final Takeaway

The best cybersecurity services help financial institutions reduce risk, maintain compliance, and protect customer trust.

Cybersecurity is no longer just an IT issue.

It’s a core business survival issue.

FAQ

Why are banks targeted by hackers?

Financial data and payment systems remain highly profitable for cybercriminals.

What cybersecurity controls matter most?

Multi-factor authentication, monitoring systems, employee training, and endpoint protection remain critical.

Best CRM Software for Small Businesses in 2026

Small businesses are always looking for tools that save time, organize leads, and improve sales. CRM software is a strong topic because it attracts business owners and decision-makers, which often means better ad value.[ranktracker]
This article should compare CRM tools by ease of use, automation, integrations, pricing, and team size. Business software is a profitable niche, and content that helps readers choose between products tends to rank well when it is clear and practical.[siteimprove +1]
Use a title like “Best CRM Software for Small Businesses in 2026: Top Picks Compared.” Then break the article into useful sections such as best overall, best budget option, best for sales teams, and best for service businesses. That structure gives you multiple keyword opportunities and makes the article more useful to readers.