MDC leader Nelson Chamisa says the Church must lead the way in initiating dialogue between him and President Emmerson Mnangagwa so as to rescue long-suffering Zimbabweans who are staring at a bleak future.
However, well-placed sources in government say Mnangagwa is unlikely to be swayed by the Church which is reportedly getting its funding from foreign countries that are deemed hostile to Zimbabwe.
The insiders said the nexus between Chamisa and the Church spooked Mnangagwa from attending the prayer meeting that was organised by the Ecumenical Church Leaders Forum. But with Mnangagwa plodding ahead with his engagements with opposition parties, albeit fringe players, Chamisa said the Zanu PF leader is behaving like an ostrich, burying his head in the sand when the economy is on its knees.
“The only way forward is a comprehensive reform programme upon nation-building and peace-building to facilitate national healing and national engagement and international realignment, in order for us to deal with the crisis there must be genuine dialogue.
“We have shouted our voices hoarse inviting Mnangagwa to a table of national dialogue to resolve these issues because nations are built on a foundation of dialogue, but engagement the ostrich way will not resolve our issues.
“The arrogant mindset will not resolve our issues, the dog-eat-dog will not resolve our crisis, we need a credible dialogue, the churches could be a consideration, or maybe former heads of States but it must be underwritten by the international community.
“This is the only answer to the cries of the people, this is the only credible answer to the rural and urban people who are suffering, we need to have a conducive environment for business, we cannot be focussing on politics all the time, the business cycle should be longer than that of politics,” said Chamisa.
Mnangagwa controversially won last year elections, just squeezing through the 50 plus 1 percent threshold.
Although Chamisa contested the outcome in a petition to the Constitutional Court, his application was thrown out.
However, the economy continues to bleed and immediate relief that was expected to come following the election is yet to arrive.
Instead the United States of America extended its sanctions on Zimbabwe alleging human rights abuses and that the people on the sanctions list are a threat to the world superpower’s global interests.
Since the July 30 contested elections, the situation has gone from bad to worse, prices of basic commodities are going up and government’s response to the economic calamities has been the imposition of more and more taxes such as the ubiquitous two percent transaction tax.
“Zimbabweans are suffering, the country is in a deep crisis the crisis is a crisis of governance, the crisis of confidence the crisis of trust, in short it is a political crisis with ramifications on the social wellbeing of the people, this is all occasioned by a disputed elections, what is surprising is that eight months after the elections there is no solution, in other countries this could have been resolved,” said Chamisa.
Mnangagwa’s plan to push for national dialogue has suffered a series of setbacks as more and more opposition parties disengage from the platform citing a lack of sincerity from the incumbent.
Several high profile politicians including Build Zimbabwe leader Noah Manyika and Daniel Shumba of the United Democratic Alliance (UDA) who attended the inaugural meeting have since distanced themselves from the negotiating table citing a plethora of reasons.
Critically, the parties that have withdrawn their participation claiming that Mnangagwa is not sincere and also are demanding the inclusion of MDC Alliance leader Nelson Chamisa who snubbed the dialogue from day one.
In an interview, Shumba said the nation can decide for itself the character of the parties that are still in the so-called national dialogue.
“Zimbabweans should be able to determine the category of those who are still on the table; however, we wish them well.
“The refusal to provide a legal framework for the negotiations renders the whole platform unconstitutional,” said Shumba.
The former Zanu PF Masvingo Central legislator said on Twitter that the current efforts by Mnangagwa for dialogue are designed to hoodwink the nation into believe that there is seriousness on his part when that is not the case.
“The Constitution of Zimbabwe doesn’t provide for such a process. The absence of a willingness to legitimise the nation dialogue renders it an adventure or circus. The UDA refuses to be blindfolded or used as an extension of Zanu PF. The nation shouldn’t expect any outcomes.
“The National Dialogue fallacy is meant to clothe the fox in sheep’s clothes.
“The UDA won’t sanitise a conspiracy or be part of a betrayal of the people’s expectations.
“We’re not opportunists and won’t be part of a process that fortifies delinquencies at the people’s expense,” said Shumba.
Last week, Manyika also sent a letter to Mnangagwa indicating that he will not take part in the discussions because it was not inclusive.
“No meaningful dialogue can happen without a neutral and credible convener being agreed on to facilitate a broad and inclusive dialogue that will include trade unionists, political parties, activities, civic groups and all stakeholders to ensure that the views and interests of all Zimbabweans are represented.
“It is also my position that any dialogue that does not include the MDC Alliance and other critical stakeholders will not pass the credibility test locally and globally,” said Manyika,
Although Mnangagwa had invited all presidential candidates, the likes of Joice Mujuru who led the People Rainbow Coalition in last year’s elections and a former vice president of Zimbabwe did not pitch up, while Zimbabwe Partnership for Prosperity president Blessing Kasiyamhuru said he did not attend the meeting because he was no longer into politics.
“I am not a politician,” said Kasiyamhuru curtly when the Daily News asked him why he was not attending the national dialogue meetings.
Info News
DUI Lawyer Cost and Legal Process Explained
A DUI arrest creates panic fast.
People immediately worry about:
- Jail time
- License suspension
- Insurance increases
- Employment problems
- Court costs
That’s why many search for DUI lawyer cost and legal process information immediately after arrest.
Why DUI Cases Become Expensive
DUI cases often involve:
- Court fees
- Attorney costs
- License reinstatement expenses
- Insurance premium increases
- Mandatory classes
The financial impact can last years.
What DUI Lawyers Actually Do
Experienced attorneys may:
- Review traffic stop legality
- Challenge breathalyzer evidence
- Negotiate plea agreements
- Represent clients in court
- Protect driving privileges
Strong legal strategy matters heavily.
Factors Affecting DUI Lawyer Costs
Pricing depends on:
- Case complexity
- Prior DUI history
- Trial requirements
- State laws
- Attorney experience
Serious felony DUI cases often cost much more.
Final Takeaway
DUI cases involve both legal and financial consequences.
Experienced legal guidance may help defendants understand options, reduce penalties, and navigate complex court procedures.
FAQ
How much does a DUI lawyer cost?
Costs vary widely depending on case complexity and attorney experience.
Can a DUI charge be dismissed?
Some cases may be reduced or dismissed depending on evidence and legal strategy.
Personal Injury Lawyers: What Accident Victims Need to Know About Compensation Claims
Personal injury law remains one of the most important legal areas for individuals who suffer injuries due to accidents or negligence. Every year, millions of people are involved in car accidents, workplace injuries, slip-and-fall incidents, and medical malpractice cases that result in physical pain, emotional distress, and financial hardship. Personal injury lawyers help victims recover compensation for medical expenses, lost wages, rehabilitation costs, and other damages caused by accidents.
Hiring an experienced personal injury attorney can significantly improve the outcome of a legal claim. Insurance companies often attempt to reduce payouts or deny responsibility altogether, leaving victims struggling to cover medical bills and everyday expenses. Attorneys understand how to gather evidence, negotiate settlements, and represent clients in court when necessary. Evidence such as police reports, medical records, witness statements, and photographs can strengthen a compensation claim and increase the likelihood of a favorable result.
Many personal injury law firms work on a contingency fee basis, meaning clients do not pay legal fees unless compensation is successfully recovered. This makes legal representation more accessible for individuals facing financial difficulties after serious accidents. Experts recommend seeking legal advice as soon as possible because delays can impact evidence collection and legal deadlines. Understanding personal injury rights is essential for anyone involved in an accident caused by another party’s negligence.