Trump Delivers More Sanctions To Mnangagwa â€œIâ€™m Just Starting Watiwadiiâ€

By Staff Reporter
|
13944
|
October 27, 2019

IN AN ominous development for President Emmerson Mnangagwa and his under pressure government, the United States of America (USA) has slapped State Security minister Owen Ncube with sanctions over allegations of gross human rights violations.

This comes after Mnangagwa and Zanu PF staged widely-criticised anti-sanctions marches around the country on Friday, in which they blamed the US and the European Union (EU) for Zimbabwe's deepening economic rot.

The sanctioning of Ncube - said to be one of Mnangagwa's closest confidantes - also comes as the US and the EU are increasingly and publicly becoming more critical of Harare, despite the government's repeated claims of being committed to a truly "new" dispensation and to normalising its relations with the West.

United States Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, in a statement, said: "Today, I publicly designated Owen Ncube for his involvement in a gross violation of human rights in Zimbabwe. State-sanctioned violence in Zimbabwe must end now and those responsible for human rights violations must be held accountable."

The listing of Ncube signals United States frustration over the lack of accountability in the killings of innocent civilians in August last year and January this year, as well as ongoing abductions of opposition activists and unionists by state security agents.

There was no immediate response by Zimbabwe's government to the announcement, which is likely to bring fresh anger from the regime which on Friday declared a public holiday to press for the lifting of the sanctions in poorly-attended marches across the country.

The decision to announce the designation of Ncube on the same day as the anti-sanctions demonstrations will be read as a strong signal from President Donald Trump's administration that the lobby for the lifting of sanctions has no takers in Washington.

On the eve of Friday's demonstrations, United States Senate Foreign Relations Committee chairman Senator Jim Risch (R-Idaho) said Mnangagwa's government was "distorting facts" about the sanctions regime to deflect from its failures.

"Responsibility for the current political and economic crisis in Zimbabwe falls solely on the ruling regime that has governed the country for decades. If Zimbabwe's leaders put as much time, financial resources, and effort into delivering on their long-promised reforms as they have in distorting facts and organising ‘anti-sanctions' campaigns, Zimbabweans would not continue to suffer under the dire economic and humanitarian conditions they face today," Risch said.

In Harare, Bulawayo, Mutare, Gweru and Masvingo – the major cities – many stayed away from the anti-sanctions demonstrations, saying they were a distraction from the president's mishandling of the economy, which is plagued by 18-hour daily power cuts and shortages of foreign exchange, fuel and medicines.

Mnangagwa has so far failed to unify the country since taking over from the late Robert Mugabe, who was ousted in a coup in 2017. Hopes of a swift recovery have faded as the economy struggles to exit its deepest crisis in a decade.

Human rights groups in Zimbabwe say the level of repression after Mnangagwa seized power before claiming a controversial election victory last year has gone up several notches, with over 50 activists having been abducted and tortured by suspected state security agents this year alone.

Soldiers were deployed to suppress a protest against delays in announcing results of Zimbabwe's first election without Mugabe on the ballot in July last year. Mnangagwa unleashed the soldiers again to put down protests over sharp fuel price increases in January and February, in a crackdown that left at least 18 people dead.

The United States says it has credible information that Ncube was involved in the recent abductions and denial of the freedom of assembly to the opposition.

"The State Department has credible information that Owen Ncube was involved in gross violations of human rights in his capacity as Zimbabwe's Minister of State for National Security," a statement said.

"We are deeply troubled by the Zimbabwean government's use of state-sanctioned violence against peaceful protestors, and civil society, as well as against labour leaders and members of the opposition leaders in Zimbabwe. We urge the government to stop the violence, investigate, and hold accountable officials responsible for human rights violations and abuses in Zimbabwe."

The statement added that the United States sanctions "target those who engage in corruption, violate human rights, and undermine democratic institutions or processes."

"State-sanctioned violence creates a culture of impunity for human rights abusers. The United States continues to support the Zimbabwean people in need, especially through humanitarian and health assistance. We will continue to press the government of Zimbabwe to implement necessary political and economic reforms to provide Zimbabwean citizens the prosperity, security, and well-being they deserve."

The United States and the European Union, which imposed sanctions almost two decades ago over alleged rights abuses, have in recent months issued several statements warning against continued violations.

Mnangagwa's government has made the lifting of sanctions a top priority and has held several meetings with senior officials from the United States and the European Union to lobby for that and Zimbabwe's readmission to the Commonwealth.

Risch warned regional countries against weighing in on the side of Zimbabwe's "kleptocratic" government.

"The ruling party should focus on the needs of the Zimbabwean people instead of their bad governance, corruption, and state capture," he said.

"Regional institutions should also focus their energies on supporting democracy, not kleptocratic regimes," he added in an apparent reference to the Sothern African Development Community (SADC) which has backed Mnangagwa's calls for the lifting of the sanctions.

Category:
News
Politics

Info News

Best Credit Cards for Bad Credit in 2026

If your credit score is low, finding the right credit card can feel difficult. The good news is that there are still credit cards designed to help people with bad credit rebuild their financial profile while keeping spending manageable.
This topic has strong search intent because people searching for it usually want an answer right away. They are not casually browsing. They are trying to find a card they can actually qualify for, which makes this a strong topic for both SEO and monetization.
The first thing to understand is the difference between secured and unsecured cards. A secured card usually requires a refundable deposit, while an unsecured card may not. For many people with bad credit, a secured card is the easiest place to start because approval is often based on the deposit and basic income information rather than a high score.
When comparing cards, look at annual fees, interest rates, deposit requirements, and whether the card reports to the major credit bureaus. Reporting matters because the goal is not just to get a card, but to use it in a way that can help improve your credit over time. A card that does not report properly may not help you build a stronger credit history.
You should also look for cards with simple approval requirements and a path to upgrade later. Some issuers review accounts after several months of responsible use and may allow you to move to a better card. That can be useful if your goal is to rebuild credit and eventually qualify for stronger rewards or lower rates.
Using the card responsibly is just as important as choosing the right one. Make small purchases, keep your balance low, and pay on time every month. These habits can help improve your credit profile over time and make future borrowing easier.
It is also wise to avoid cards with unnecessary fees or confusing terms. When your credit is already damaged, the last thing you want is a product that makes the situation worse. The best card should help you move forward, not trap you in more debt.
The best credit card for bad credit is the one that is easy to qualify for, reports to the credit bureaus, and helps you rebuild your financial standing with responsible use.

How Much Does Cloud Migration Cost for Mid-Sized Companies?

Cloud migration sounds exciting when vendors pitch it.

Lower costs. Better scalability. Stronger security. Faster systems.

But once companies actually begin the migration process, reality hits fast.

Unexpected expenses start appearing everywhere.

That’s why business leaders keep asking the same question in 2026.

How much does cloud migration cost for mid-sized companies?

The answer depends on far more than just moving files from one server to another.

Why Mid-Sized Companies Are Moving to the Cloud

Mid-sized businesses sit in a difficult position.

They’ve usually outgrown basic IT infrastructure but still need to control spending carefully.

Cloud migration helps companies:

Scale operations faster
Support remote work
Improve disaster recovery
Increase cybersecurity protections
Reduce hardware maintenance
Deploy AI and analytics tools

For many businesses, cloud infrastructure is no longer optional.

It’s becoming essential for long-term growth.

Average Cloud Migration Costs in 2026

There is no universal pricing model.

However, many mid-sized companies spend anywhere from:

$50,000 to $500,000+

Depending on complexity.

Some enterprise migrations cost significantly more.

The biggest factors are usually:

Infrastructure size
Application complexity
Compliance requirements
Downtime tolerance
Security architecture
Data volume

A simple migration looks very different from a regulated healthcare or financial environment.

Major Costs Businesses Often Underestimate

This is where budgets can spiral quickly.

Many companies focus only on cloud subscription pricing while ignoring the hidden migration costs.

Application Refactoring

Older applications may not work efficiently in cloud environments.

Developers often need to:

Rewrite code
Modernize systems
Rebuild integrations
Optimize databases

This becomes expensive fast.

Especially for legacy systems.

Downtime and Productivity Losses

Even well-planned migrations create operational disruptions.

Employees may temporarily lose access to:

Internal systems
Email services
Business applications
File storage

Downtime costs can become massive for businesses relying heavily on digital operations.

Cybersecurity and Compliance Upgrades

Cloud security is not automatic.

Many companies mistakenly assume cloud providers fully handle security.

They do not.

Businesses still need:

Identity management systems
Endpoint security
Access controls
Monitoring tools
Compliance audits
Backup systems

Highly regulated industries face even stricter requirements.

Public Cloud vs Private Cloud Costs

Choosing the right environment matters.

Public Cloud

Public cloud environments like:

AWS
Microsoft Azure
Google Cloud

Usually offer:

Lower upfront costs
Strong scalability
Flexible pricing

But ongoing usage costs can rise quickly if resources are poorly managed.

Private Cloud

Private cloud systems provide:

Greater control
Enhanced customization
Stronger isolation

However, costs are often much higher.

Many mid-sized companies choose hybrid cloud environments instead.

Hybrid Cloud Migration Costs

Hybrid environments combine:

On-premise infrastructure
Private cloud systems
Public cloud services

This model appeals to companies needing both flexibility and regulatory control.

But hybrid migrations are often more technically complex.

That means:

Higher consulting costs
More integration work
Advanced networking requirements

Why Cloud Cost Optimization Matters

A badly optimized cloud environment can waste enormous amounts of money.

Companies frequently overspend because:

Unused resources remain active
Storage grows unchecked
Compute instances run unnecessarily
AI workloads consume excessive GPU resources

Cloud cost optimization has become a massive enterprise industry itself.

Common Cloud Migration Mistakes

Many mid-sized companies rush migration projects without proper planning.

That usually creates bigger costs later.

Common mistakes include:

Migrating outdated applications without modernization
Underestimating security requirements
Ignoring employee training
Failing to test backup systems
Choosing providers based only on price

Cheap migrations often become expensive disasters.

How Companies Reduce Migration Costs

Experienced IT teams usually approach migration in phases.

That strategy helps reduce operational risks.

Many companies:

Migrate non-critical systems first
Conduct security audits early
Use automation tools
Monitor cloud spending closely
Work with specialized consultants

Planning saves money.

Rushed migrations rarely do.

Why Cloud Migration Keywords Have High CPC

Cloud migration services generate high-value enterprise contracts.

Technology vendors, MSPs, cybersecurity firms, and consulting companies aggressively compete for qualified business leads.

That’s exactly why cloud migration SEO topics attract strong advertising competition.

Final Takeaway

Cloud migration costs for mid-sized companies in 2026 depend heavily on infrastructure complexity, security requirements, application modernization, and long-term scalability goals.

For some businesses, migration creates major efficiency gains.

For others, poor planning leads to spiraling costs and operational headaches.

The smartest companies treat cloud migration as a long-term business strategy instead of a quick IT project.

That mindset usually leads to far better results.

FAQ

How much does cloud migration cost for a mid-sized company?

Costs commonly range from tens of thousands to several hundred thousand dollars depending on complexity.

What is the biggest hidden cloud migration expense?

Application modernization and security upgrades are often underestimated.

Is cloud migration cheaper than on-premise infrastructure?

It can be, but long-term savings depend on proper optimization and management.

Which industries spend the most on cloud migration?

Healthcare, financial services, manufacturing, and enterprise SaaS companies invest heavily in cloud infrastructure.

How long does cloud migration usually take?

Some projects take several months while large enterprise migrations may take years.